Following the announcement by Amazon's KDP Publishing that it is now able to publish titles in hardcover, both The Best Year Of Our Lives and 1000 Memories of 1976 are now available for purchase in this exciting new format.
I have deliberately kept the prices as low as possible (although Amazon itself seems to be arbitrarily resetting the price of the former on an almost daily basis). The prototype copies that I have ordered for myself would suggest that there are no quality issues to be concerned about.
Please click here for more information, and for details of all my titles.
Wednesday, 5 January 2022
The Best Year Of Our Lives and 1000 Memories of 1976 Now Available in Hardcover
Friday, 6 August 2021
Friday, 23 July 2021
Introducing My New Author Page
Anyone looking for a change of scenery might wish to take a look at my new Author Page, where all of my current works are featured side by side for ease of reference. It features a handy contact form for enquiries and will run a regular blog featuring longer articles than would be the norm at this site. Please feel free to take a look by clicking here.
Thursday, 4 February 2021
Monday, 18 January 2021
Memories of 1976?
Over the last couple of months I've been labouring over a new literary project with the working title Memories of 1976.
As it implies on the tin, the idea has been to solicit memories via Facebook nostalgia groups from people of a certain age who have some kind of affinity to 1976 - the year of that never-ending summer when the old met the new in music and in popular culture, while an unstable world seemed to totter on the brink of economic meltdown tinged with a worrying if still remote prospect of nuclear conflagration.
If the intention was to use content from others as an easy means of filling pages for my own work then things haven't quite gone to plan. Expecting maybe two to three dozen responses, instead I received nearly 1600, which now need to be ploughed through and placed into some kind of logical context which leaves nothing out and yet somehow retains its freshness through to the final page. Honour obliges me to include every sensible contribution, as I promised all those who engaged with the project that I would. And so what began as an idea for an easy win for a new booklet has morphed into something which threatens to resemble a sequel to War And Peace.
No matter, it is what it is. I will announce the new masterpiece to an eagerly awaiting world just as soon as it is available. To be truthful I'm rather looking forward to it as I'm confident it will be a work worthy of a place in the burgeoning archives of retro, as well as a useful reminder that things don't always go to plan.
As it implies on the tin, the idea has been to solicit memories via Facebook nostalgia groups from people of a certain age who have some kind of affinity to 1976 - the year of that never-ending summer when the old met the new in music and in popular culture, while an unstable world seemed to totter on the brink of economic meltdown tinged with a worrying if still remote prospect of nuclear conflagration.
If the intention was to use content from others as an easy means of filling pages for my own work then things haven't quite gone to plan. Expecting maybe two to three dozen responses, instead I received nearly 1600, which now need to be ploughed through and placed into some kind of logical context which leaves nothing out and yet somehow retains its freshness through to the final page. Honour obliges me to include every sensible contribution, as I promised all those who engaged with the project that I would. And so what began as an idea for an easy win for a new booklet has morphed into something which threatens to resemble a sequel to War And Peace.
No matter, it is what it is. I will announce the new masterpiece to an eagerly awaiting world just as soon as it is available. To be truthful I'm rather looking forward to it as I'm confident it will be a work worthy of a place in the burgeoning archives of retro, as well as a useful reminder that things don't always go to plan.
Thursday, 24 September 2020
Read a Free Sample of The Best Year Of Our Lives
It is now possible to read a free sample of The Best Year Of Our Lives before ordering. Please just click below:
Tuesday, 15 September 2020
Your Memories of 1976 Wanted
I am presently researching for a new booklet featuring memories and experiences of the wonderful year that was 1976 from those who were there, and I am hoping that as a visitor to this blog you may wish to help by lending me some of your own?
What were you doing during that long hot summer? What memories does that year have for you in particular? The music? The drought and the ladybirds? A memorable holiday perhaps? Some special event in your life? Recollections from your youth?
If you'd like to contribute a few lines for the booklet, a few keepsakes, please just add them under Comments at the foot of this post or send me a PM. I'll need the name you'd like to be identified by (it can be initials, first name, or whatever you like) and a location - nothing too detailed or which gives too much information please.
Typos and bad grammar will be corrected, profanities will be deleted (as will anything which identifies anyone), but beyond that the floor is yours. Remember, it's about 1976 so please try to focus on that year if you can.
What were you doing during that long hot summer? What memories does that year have for you in particular? The music? The drought and the ladybirds? A memorable holiday perhaps? Some special event in your life? Recollections from your youth?
If you'd like to contribute a few lines for the booklet, a few keepsakes, please just add them under Comments at the foot of this post or send me a PM. I'll need the name you'd like to be identified by (it can be initials, first name, or whatever you like) and a location - nothing too detailed or which gives too much information please.
Typos and bad grammar will be corrected, profanities will be deleted (as will anything which identifies anyone), but beyond that the floor is yours. Remember, it's about 1976 so please try to focus on that year if you can.
Friday, 24 April 2020
Get the Ebook Free of Charge - Offer Closes Tuesday 28th April 2020
For a limited time only The Best Year Of Our Lives is available in ebook format completely free of charge.
Simply click here and download the Kindle reader if you don't already have one (that's free too!). Then click where it says "£0.00 to buy" and follow the instructions to get the book.
There no catch, but if you enjoy the read please take a few moments to write me a review on the site.
Simply click here and download the Kindle reader if you don't already have one (that's free too!). Then click where it says "£0.00 to buy" and follow the instructions to get the book.
There no catch, but if you enjoy the read please take a few moments to write me a review on the site.
Monday, 3 February 2020
Guest Posts Welcome
I am always grateful for on-topic contributions from visitors to this blog.
Do you have an interesting story to tell relating to 1976? Some memories from school perhaps, from your neighbourhood, or just some thoughts in general about the fashions, the music scene, television programmes or popular culture?
Please send me a message at info@phil-andrews.co.uk and we can discuss featuring it as a stand-alone blog story. I will be happy to include a byline and a discreet link back to your own blog or website, just so long as it isn't spammy.
This is your resource, please feel free to use it as well as to read it.
Do you have an interesting story to tell relating to 1976? Some memories from school perhaps, from your neighbourhood, or just some thoughts in general about the fashions, the music scene, television programmes or popular culture?
Please send me a message at info@phil-andrews.co.uk and we can discuss featuring it as a stand-alone blog story. I will be happy to include a byline and a discreet link back to your own blog or website, just so long as it isn't spammy.
This is your resource, please feel free to use it as well as to read it.
Wednesday, 21 August 2019
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Paul Adams
For obvious reasons, Paul Adams was at the same time both the easiest and the most difficult character for me to portray.
Easiest, because I had a personal insight into his psyche. I know what makes him tick, even if some of those who share this story with him are not so sure. I share his musical enthusiasms, his anxieties, his yearnings, and his sense of longing for a past that is uncertain, undefined, and in equal part mystical and mythical. Such over-familiarity also made it the most difficult.
The various observations I have received from readers about the character of Paul Adams are noted. He was never going to be wholly the good guy or the bad, he is not a character to be reduced to such binary simplicities. He is a complex subject for analysis, even for me. In varying proportions he is vain, delusional, manipulative, devious, indecisive, sometimes cowardly and most times obsessive. In his defence he is also protective, loyal, romantic, resourceful, pragmatic, aspirational and, in his own mind at least, even visionary. His destination is formless but the path that leads him, and others, to it is forever clear.
CONFUSED BY TIME
Paul is a character confused by time, to the extent that he simply refuses to accept the transient nature of his existence. If it happened at some point in the past and lingers within his soul then as far as he is concerned it is still happening. He cocks a snook at impermanence and plants his flag defiantly upon the hill of his apogee, challenging life to do its worst. The best year of his life is, for Paul, a transcendent experience.
Whatever inspiration I may have drawn from literary greats such as Tolkein or C.S. Lewis, the story which loomed large in my subconscious, particularly in the later chapters, was Quadrophenia. The story of Jimmy the mod, albeit a character slightly older and meaner than Paul Adams, was one with which there were obvious parallels, although I did not consciously plan it that way and the fact only really occurred to me after publication. All the same the idea of Paul riding off a cliff on a stolen scooter to his death once the euphoria of the big event had faded, and everything he had lived for had crumbled so quickly and so completely into dust, seemed to me to be inappropriate and overstated.
ANTICLIMACTIC
Instead I chose to bring him back to Earth with a bump, in an Epilogue so anticlimactic that it would disorient the reader every bit as much as had any of the chapters charting Paul’s ascent to imagined greatness. Or that was the intention anyway. Once the story had been told and the magic had been fulfilled Paul Adams alighted from the wardrobe. Alone.
I feel there are many chapters left in Paul Adams, but what tale they will tell I truly do not know. The best year of anybody’s life cannot, by definition, be bettered.
Easiest, because I had a personal insight into his psyche. I know what makes him tick, even if some of those who share this story with him are not so sure. I share his musical enthusiasms, his anxieties, his yearnings, and his sense of longing for a past that is uncertain, undefined, and in equal part mystical and mythical. Such over-familiarity also made it the most difficult.
The various observations I have received from readers about the character of Paul Adams are noted. He was never going to be wholly the good guy or the bad, he is not a character to be reduced to such binary simplicities. He is a complex subject for analysis, even for me. In varying proportions he is vain, delusional, manipulative, devious, indecisive, sometimes cowardly and most times obsessive. In his defence he is also protective, loyal, romantic, resourceful, pragmatic, aspirational and, in his own mind at least, even visionary. His destination is formless but the path that leads him, and others, to it is forever clear.
CONFUSED BY TIME
Paul is a character confused by time, to the extent that he simply refuses to accept the transient nature of his existence. If it happened at some point in the past and lingers within his soul then as far as he is concerned it is still happening. He cocks a snook at impermanence and plants his flag defiantly upon the hill of his apogee, challenging life to do its worst. The best year of his life is, for Paul, a transcendent experience.
Whatever inspiration I may have drawn from literary greats such as Tolkein or C.S. Lewis, the story which loomed large in my subconscious, particularly in the later chapters, was Quadrophenia. The story of Jimmy the mod, albeit a character slightly older and meaner than Paul Adams, was one with which there were obvious parallels, although I did not consciously plan it that way and the fact only really occurred to me after publication. All the same the idea of Paul riding off a cliff on a stolen scooter to his death once the euphoria of the big event had faded, and everything he had lived for had crumbled so quickly and so completely into dust, seemed to me to be inappropriate and overstated.
ANTICLIMACTIC
Instead I chose to bring him back to Earth with a bump, in an Epilogue so anticlimactic that it would disorient the reader every bit as much as had any of the chapters charting Paul’s ascent to imagined greatness. Or that was the intention anyway. Once the story had been told and the magic had been fulfilled Paul Adams alighted from the wardrobe. Alone.
I feel there are many chapters left in Paul Adams, but what tale they will tell I truly do not know. The best year of anybody’s life cannot, by definition, be bettered.
Wednesday, 9 January 2019
Where the Title Came From...
This was the song which inspired the title of my novel. It seemed so apt on so many levels, and there could be no more fitting tribute to all those people who made 1976 and that whole period such a wonderful and special time for me. Thank you my friends, and thank you Mr. Harley for putting it all into words for me so masterfully.
Thursday, 6 December 2018
My Top 10 Online Survey Companies
According to somebody who knows about these things, there are an estimated 62,000 authors presently "in some sort of employment" in the United Kingdom.
What must be straight away obvious is that not all of these people can be living in the lap of luxury as a consequence of their literary efforts. Indeed for every J.K. Rowling it is reasonable to assume that there will be, well, at least 61,000 "professional" authors at the opposite end of the income scale, having sold their self-published magnum opus to their mother and her mate, and to very few others. By comparison, my own four-figure sales tally (at time of writing) may strike one as a veritable success story. But it still doesn't pay the bills.
Which means that, like most other writers, I find myself doing other "jobs" to plug the wage gap, and one of my many income streams is paid online surveys – assisting market researchers in undertaking demographic profiling for the extremely modest payment which they all offer.
There are literally hundreds of survey providers, some of which are better to work with than others. Below I have listed ten of my favourites:
Provides intelligent research and informed insight for clients in the worlds of business, culture and politics. On balance probably my first choice for surveys due to its generous payments.
PROS: Amongst the highest payers, PopulusLive surveys generally command around £1 for every five minutes' work undertaken. Surveys tend to come in clusters, with two or three some days and nothing for several days at other times. Screen-outs (an irritating occupational hazard for survey enthusiasts in which participants are advised that they are unsuitable and do not qualify) are infrequent by comparison with some others, and occur – as they should – early into the process. The interface is nearly always the same, making for an unflustered and easy-to-follow experience. Payment is by cheque in increments of £50, sent out the month after the target has been reached.
CONS: Customer service can be erratic. On the one solitary occasion when I've had to report the non-arrival of a cheque I had to threaten the company with the regulator before it felt the need to respond to any of my e-mails, and then the reply was perfunctory and unapologetic. Take care when completing surveys to enter accurate information as failure to do so usually results in instant disqualification with no second chances.
Formerly called Mintvine, this US-facing company provides a whole bunch of surveys each and every day, some of which command very generous payment and others which certainly do not. Each day at 3pm (UK time) a new mini-poll appears on the home page which pays $0.05 for a single question answered. Not much I know, but you'll be surprised how much it adds up!
PROS: Nearly always a wide range of surveys to choose from, for which notification is sent (if you so choose) by e-mail. Some can offer up to $4 a time, but the beauty is that the survey value is always provided so you can choose which ones you think are worth doing (although quite often the high-value surveys become unavailable very quickly). Low payout threshold of just $10 cleared funds, which can be achieved in a matter of a couple of days.
CONS: The US focus means some of the surveys can be arcane and irrelevant to UK participants. Screen-out can sometimes occur some way into the process and a formal complaint will usually, even if successful, result in a meagre amount of compensation being awarded.
London-based market research and insight consultancy. Surveys tend to pay 25p, 50p or 75p, depending upon length.
PROS: A consistent interface and relatively few screen-outs. Although payments are modest surveys tend to be of an acceptable duration, with unpleasant surprises a rare occurrence. Payouts are made promptly once an account balance of £25 is reached.
CONS: The website can be very hit and miss, with error messages aplenty. Surveys are not usually affected, but such things as checking one's balance are a luxury best taken advantage of when everything is working.
One of the original and best-known survey providers, YouGov specialises in providing polling data for political purposes but it also does a whole lot besides. Its easy-to-use format and generous referral bonus makes it something of a favourite for many.
PROS: Screen-outs are almost unheard of as potential customers are screened before invitations are sent out (most other survey companies are appallingly lazy in this regard). A regular interface and impressively interactive website make for an enjoyable survey experience.
CONS: Rewards are modest (usually 50p) and surveys can be few and far between, meaning it can take some months to hit the £50 threshold for a payout. A good account to have in the portfolio but don't be depending on it to feed the family.
An online and app-based mobile community asking questions about the products and services you use and places you visit every day.
PROS: A handy app enables participants to take surveys on the go without having to negotiate the torturous web links and awkward screens not properly configured for mobiles which can be the experience offered by many of its rivals. Although most pay 25p, 50p or 75p higher value surveys up to £3.50 are not unusual. Payout is at £25, which can be reached relatively quickly.
CONS: Screen-outs occur more frequently than would be ideal, sometimes some way in to the survey. Customer service can sometimes be erratic when this is complained about.
Australia-based but UK-facing provider which provides a handy feed containing surveys roughly matched to your profile. Surveys are usually valued according to length and rewards are reasonable.
PROS: Easy-to-use feed and a good proportion of valid surveys which enable you to complete the process and claim your reward. Where screen-out occurs a compensation payment of 5p is made, making the disappointment a little more bearable. Payout is at £25 and arrives promptly.
CONS: Very few, other than at times viable surveys can be frustratingly few whilst at others they can be plentiful.
A favourite to many survey enthusiasts but a source of some frustration to others, Panelbase is one of the fastest-growing and most popular online research communities on the web. Also provides occasional focus groups by invitation.
PROS: Alerts are sent by e-mail and rewards are usually generous when measured against time taken. Any surveys under £1 are pleasingly concise and a low threshold of just £10 means frequent prompt payouts. By popular consent one of the best-paying and most well-liked providers out there.
CONS: Screen-outs are frequent and would appear to have become more so of late, to the point where they now seem to be the norm rather than the exception. Sometimes they appear random and arbitrary, whilst at others they can occur well into the survey rather than during the first few screens as is supposed to happen. Complaints are sometimes addressed promptly – if you reach the right person. I tend to avoid their third-party surveys as some of them seem a tad unscrupulous and Panelbase seem to exert little control over them.
Wants to hear what you think about the very latest products and big issues affecting you. Offers surveys, discussions and polls.
PROS: Generous rewards for surveys which are of a reasonable length. Sometimes provides online communities by invitation which can pay at a rate of up to £15-£30 per hour. £20 threshold for payouts.
CONS: Surveys are infrequent and can sometimes be on very similar topics, meaning that participants who are screened out of one are likely to be screened out of all of them. Unless I have been unlucky, payouts seem to arrive some very considerable time after they have been claimed.
A very popular and quirky survey company which provides a large number of very short, low-value and often "fun" polls, as well as the occasional outdoor video project.
PROS: Lots of short polls – by the time the participant has gone through the list there will probably have been another one appear. Fun topics make them a pleasure to take part in.
CONS: Low rewards mean a lot of effort has to be put in to reach the £40 payout threshold (although loyal customers are sometimes rewarded with their own personal lower limit – mine is currently down to £25!).
I have included this because it is "different" in so many ways. Participants who have opted in to receive them are sent notices of each new survey (literally dozens each and every day). Priced in dollars and with a US slant, it might just be possible to use up every waking hour only attending to surveys from this company. Some I know do just that.
PROS: With an almost unlimited supply of surveys, the $30 minimum payout is not difficult to reach in a relatively short space of time. Some, although certainly by no means all, pay quite generously.
CONS: A high proportion of screen-outs, and many surveys are priced at "Up to….." - so one never really knows how much they are paying out until the money is in one's account. And that doesn't happen until a week later.
What must be straight away obvious is that not all of these people can be living in the lap of luxury as a consequence of their literary efforts. Indeed for every J.K. Rowling it is reasonable to assume that there will be, well, at least 61,000 "professional" authors at the opposite end of the income scale, having sold their self-published magnum opus to their mother and her mate, and to very few others. By comparison, my own four-figure sales tally (at time of writing) may strike one as a veritable success story. But it still doesn't pay the bills.
Which means that, like most other writers, I find myself doing other "jobs" to plug the wage gap, and one of my many income streams is paid online surveys – assisting market researchers in undertaking demographic profiling for the extremely modest payment which they all offer.
There are literally hundreds of survey providers, some of which are better to work with than others. Below I have listed ten of my favourites:
Provides intelligent research and informed insight for clients in the worlds of business, culture and politics. On balance probably my first choice for surveys due to its generous payments.
PROS: Amongst the highest payers, PopulusLive surveys generally command around £1 for every five minutes' work undertaken. Surveys tend to come in clusters, with two or three some days and nothing for several days at other times. Screen-outs (an irritating occupational hazard for survey enthusiasts in which participants are advised that they are unsuitable and do not qualify) are infrequent by comparison with some others, and occur – as they should – early into the process. The interface is nearly always the same, making for an unflustered and easy-to-follow experience. Payment is by cheque in increments of £50, sent out the month after the target has been reached.
CONS: Customer service can be erratic. On the one solitary occasion when I've had to report the non-arrival of a cheque I had to threaten the company with the regulator before it felt the need to respond to any of my e-mails, and then the reply was perfunctory and unapologetic. Take care when completing surveys to enter accurate information as failure to do so usually results in instant disqualification with no second chances.
Formerly called Mintvine, this US-facing company provides a whole bunch of surveys each and every day, some of which command very generous payment and others which certainly do not. Each day at 3pm (UK time) a new mini-poll appears on the home page which pays $0.05 for a single question answered. Not much I know, but you'll be surprised how much it adds up!
PROS: Nearly always a wide range of surveys to choose from, for which notification is sent (if you so choose) by e-mail. Some can offer up to $4 a time, but the beauty is that the survey value is always provided so you can choose which ones you think are worth doing (although quite often the high-value surveys become unavailable very quickly). Low payout threshold of just $10 cleared funds, which can be achieved in a matter of a couple of days.
CONS: The US focus means some of the surveys can be arcane and irrelevant to UK participants. Screen-out can sometimes occur some way into the process and a formal complaint will usually, even if successful, result in a meagre amount of compensation being awarded.
London-based market research and insight consultancy. Surveys tend to pay 25p, 50p or 75p, depending upon length.
PROS: A consistent interface and relatively few screen-outs. Although payments are modest surveys tend to be of an acceptable duration, with unpleasant surprises a rare occurrence. Payouts are made promptly once an account balance of £25 is reached.
CONS: The website can be very hit and miss, with error messages aplenty. Surveys are not usually affected, but such things as checking one's balance are a luxury best taken advantage of when everything is working.
One of the original and best-known survey providers, YouGov specialises in providing polling data for political purposes but it also does a whole lot besides. Its easy-to-use format and generous referral bonus makes it something of a favourite for many.
PROS: Screen-outs are almost unheard of as potential customers are screened before invitations are sent out (most other survey companies are appallingly lazy in this regard). A regular interface and impressively interactive website make for an enjoyable survey experience.
CONS: Rewards are modest (usually 50p) and surveys can be few and far between, meaning it can take some months to hit the £50 threshold for a payout. A good account to have in the portfolio but don't be depending on it to feed the family.
An online and app-based mobile community asking questions about the products and services you use and places you visit every day.
PROS: A handy app enables participants to take surveys on the go without having to negotiate the torturous web links and awkward screens not properly configured for mobiles which can be the experience offered by many of its rivals. Although most pay 25p, 50p or 75p higher value surveys up to £3.50 are not unusual. Payout is at £25, which can be reached relatively quickly.
CONS: Screen-outs occur more frequently than would be ideal, sometimes some way in to the survey. Customer service can sometimes be erratic when this is complained about.
Australia-based but UK-facing provider which provides a handy feed containing surveys roughly matched to your profile. Surveys are usually valued according to length and rewards are reasonable.
PROS: Easy-to-use feed and a good proportion of valid surveys which enable you to complete the process and claim your reward. Where screen-out occurs a compensation payment of 5p is made, making the disappointment a little more bearable. Payout is at £25 and arrives promptly.
CONS: Very few, other than at times viable surveys can be frustratingly few whilst at others they can be plentiful.
A favourite to many survey enthusiasts but a source of some frustration to others, Panelbase is one of the fastest-growing and most popular online research communities on the web. Also provides occasional focus groups by invitation.
PROS: Alerts are sent by e-mail and rewards are usually generous when measured against time taken. Any surveys under £1 are pleasingly concise and a low threshold of just £10 means frequent prompt payouts. By popular consent one of the best-paying and most well-liked providers out there.
CONS: Screen-outs are frequent and would appear to have become more so of late, to the point where they now seem to be the norm rather than the exception. Sometimes they appear random and arbitrary, whilst at others they can occur well into the survey rather than during the first few screens as is supposed to happen. Complaints are sometimes addressed promptly – if you reach the right person. I tend to avoid their third-party surveys as some of them seem a tad unscrupulous and Panelbase seem to exert little control over them.
Wants to hear what you think about the very latest products and big issues affecting you. Offers surveys, discussions and polls.
PROS: Generous rewards for surveys which are of a reasonable length. Sometimes provides online communities by invitation which can pay at a rate of up to £15-£30 per hour. £20 threshold for payouts.
CONS: Surveys are infrequent and can sometimes be on very similar topics, meaning that participants who are screened out of one are likely to be screened out of all of them. Unless I have been unlucky, payouts seem to arrive some very considerable time after they have been claimed.
A very popular and quirky survey company which provides a large number of very short, low-value and often "fun" polls, as well as the occasional outdoor video project.
PROS: Lots of short polls – by the time the participant has gone through the list there will probably have been another one appear. Fun topics make them a pleasure to take part in.
CONS: Low rewards mean a lot of effort has to be put in to reach the £40 payout threshold (although loyal customers are sometimes rewarded with their own personal lower limit – mine is currently down to £25!).
I have included this because it is "different" in so many ways. Participants who have opted in to receive them are sent notices of each new survey (literally dozens each and every day). Priced in dollars and with a US slant, it might just be possible to use up every waking hour only attending to surveys from this company. Some I know do just that.
PROS: With an almost unlimited supply of surveys, the $30 minimum payout is not difficult to reach in a relatively short space of time. Some, although certainly by no means all, pay quite generously.
CONS: A high proportion of screen-outs, and many surveys are priced at "Up to….." - so one never really knows how much they are paying out until the money is in one's account. And that doesn't happen until a week later.
Tuesday, 11 September 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Alan Webb
Alan Webb is the only character I am profiling who is not a member of the eight. The reason will be immediately obvious to anybody who reads the story: the gang's enmity for Paul Adams' erstwhile mucker is the chord which binds them together during this their second rideout. He alone had been the reason for the gang's demise the first time around, of which we know only a limited amount, and he is equally the cause of its coming together for a second time – older, wiser and rapt by the most beautiful summer that living man had encountered before or since.
But there is another reason why I feel the need to grant special status to Alan Webb. When discussing The Best Year Of Our Lives with friends and acquaintances who have been kind enough to read it and offer me feedback I have been overwhelmed, if not entirely surprised, by the amount of sympathy that this character in particular has provoked. "I feel sorry for that person you bullied," said one, confusing me as author with the lead actor. "I liked Alan Webb much more than I liked Paul Adams," admitted another.
NOT UNINTENTIONAL
I have to confess this wasn't entirely unintentional on my part. The negative portrayal of Alan Webb throughout most of the book was only ever intended to reflect the view of him taken by the one through whose eyes the story was told. He begins the tale as Alan, is relegated to Webb before becoming Alan once again with a handshake and an awkward reminisce. But through it all he is stoical, courageous and admirably defiant in his predicament. He has to suffer, in order that the gang might thrive. He is the blood sacrifice of a halcyon adventure. That is the simple dynamic, the reader was never meant to hate him.
Alan Webb brings out the leader in Paul, the loyalty in Jim, the affection in Tina and the infant heroism in Pete. Unwittingly he is the catalyst for great things, for an explosion of love made magnificent by a common if oft exaggerated hatred. Some would see him as one of the most noble characters in the book, and I always intended it that way.
Alan doesn't leave the story in as dramatic a style as he first entered it, but he is thematic to it throughout. Wherever he is today, I wish him well and I'm sure Paul Adams would feel the same.
But there is another reason why I feel the need to grant special status to Alan Webb. When discussing The Best Year Of Our Lives with friends and acquaintances who have been kind enough to read it and offer me feedback I have been overwhelmed, if not entirely surprised, by the amount of sympathy that this character in particular has provoked. "I feel sorry for that person you bullied," said one, confusing me as author with the lead actor. "I liked Alan Webb much more than I liked Paul Adams," admitted another.
NOT UNINTENTIONAL
I have to confess this wasn't entirely unintentional on my part. The negative portrayal of Alan Webb throughout most of the book was only ever intended to reflect the view of him taken by the one through whose eyes the story was told. He begins the tale as Alan, is relegated to Webb before becoming Alan once again with a handshake and an awkward reminisce. But through it all he is stoical, courageous and admirably defiant in his predicament. He has to suffer, in order that the gang might thrive. He is the blood sacrifice of a halcyon adventure. That is the simple dynamic, the reader was never meant to hate him.
Alan Webb brings out the leader in Paul, the loyalty in Jim, the affection in Tina and the infant heroism in Pete. Unwittingly he is the catalyst for great things, for an explosion of love made magnificent by a common if oft exaggerated hatred. Some would see him as one of the most noble characters in the book, and I always intended it that way.
Alan doesn't leave the story in as dramatic a style as he first entered it, but he is thematic to it throughout. Wherever he is today, I wish him well and I'm sure Paul Adams would feel the same.
Monday, 27 August 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Tina Wilson
It is probably not a question that would spring immediately to the mind of the casual reader, but one of the biggest challenges I had to face when creating and developing the dynamic of the gang of eight was to what extent it functioned as a net and not as a spider's web.
Let me put that another way. With Paul as the focal character, at the centre of everything that takes place, the story is inevitably structured in such a way that without him there would a gaping hole at the centre, and nothing would make very much sense. Like a spider's web, in which every strand leads inevitably to the spider in the middle and the whole thing is constructed around it with the spider being the only rationale for the web's existence.
CONNECTED CLOSELY
A piece of netting, on tbe other hand, comprises a series of interlocking strands with none conspicuously more important than any other. Cut a strand or two away and a net becomes a damaged net, but remains a net all the same. With a stitch or two it can be repaired, and can continue to do its work as it did before.
If this all sounds a bit hypothetical, consider the relationships between the various members of the gang – for the early part of the book at least. Choose any member of the gang and he or she is connected more closely to certain other members than to others, whether by blood or by affection. Jim is Debbie's boyfriend, Paul's best friend and Colin's brother. Colin's girlfriend is Beverley, whose brother is Steve, while Debbie's closest friend is Alison. Only when we get to Tina do we depart from this general rule.
OUTSIDER OR SPIDER?
Unlike the others Tina is introduced into The Best Year Of Our Lives as Paul's enemy, and by association Jim's too. With no peacemaker to heal the rift, one is left to assume that its duration had been considerable. Only with the break-up between Paul and his erstwhile pal Alan Webb is the ground laid for a reconciliation with Tina.
With no sibling in the gang, no best friend and no partner Tina is ostensibly the outsider, but as her relationship with Paul becomes tentatively closer that fact is not always obvious. The reader is invited to anticipate the day when Tina and Paul will draw inexorably nearer but fate can be unkind, and the cult of self certainly no less so.
Tina was a difficult character for me to get entirely right. I'm not sure I managed to do so. But far from being the outsider she for me was actually much closer to being the spider than a mere link in the net. She was ever there in Paul's thoughts; in his calculations and his aspirations, in his ideas and his dreams. None of it would have happened without her.
Let me put that another way. With Paul as the focal character, at the centre of everything that takes place, the story is inevitably structured in such a way that without him there would a gaping hole at the centre, and nothing would make very much sense. Like a spider's web, in which every strand leads inevitably to the spider in the middle and the whole thing is constructed around it with the spider being the only rationale for the web's existence.
CONNECTED CLOSELY
A piece of netting, on tbe other hand, comprises a series of interlocking strands with none conspicuously more important than any other. Cut a strand or two away and a net becomes a damaged net, but remains a net all the same. With a stitch or two it can be repaired, and can continue to do its work as it did before.
If this all sounds a bit hypothetical, consider the relationships between the various members of the gang – for the early part of the book at least. Choose any member of the gang and he or she is connected more closely to certain other members than to others, whether by blood or by affection. Jim is Debbie's boyfriend, Paul's best friend and Colin's brother. Colin's girlfriend is Beverley, whose brother is Steve, while Debbie's closest friend is Alison. Only when we get to Tina do we depart from this general rule.
OUTSIDER OR SPIDER?
Unlike the others Tina is introduced into The Best Year Of Our Lives as Paul's enemy, and by association Jim's too. With no peacemaker to heal the rift, one is left to assume that its duration had been considerable. Only with the break-up between Paul and his erstwhile pal Alan Webb is the ground laid for a reconciliation with Tina.
With no sibling in the gang, no best friend and no partner Tina is ostensibly the outsider, but as her relationship with Paul becomes tentatively closer that fact is not always obvious. The reader is invited to anticipate the day when Tina and Paul will draw inexorably nearer but fate can be unkind, and the cult of self certainly no less so.
Tina was a difficult character for me to get entirely right. I'm not sure I managed to do so. But far from being the outsider she for me was actually much closer to being the spider than a mere link in the net. She was ever there in Paul's thoughts; in his calculations and his aspirations, in his ideas and his dreams. None of it would have happened without her.
Friday, 25 May 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Jim Gray
The grey-haired man whom Paul encounters during the Epilogue describes Jim Gray as Paul's "deputy", but then I guess he would. The Best Year Of Our Lives is, of course, Paul's story, which lends some explanation to this assumption.
Jim is just a little bit younger, and just a little bit smaller, than Paul, and at their age this may indeed count for something. But these slender margins of seniority should not be permitted to obscure the seminal role played by Jim in making this story work. He is at the centre of it all - his father runs the club, his girlfriend is Paul's closest competitor, his brother has an integral role to play and, perhaps most importantly, his sense of perspective more than once keeps Paul treading the straightest path.
CREATING THE CORRECT DYNAMIC
Creating the correct dynamic between Jim and Debbie was one of my most difficult challenges during the writing of this book. Whilst Debbie's oozing charisma and cool bravado threatens to overwhelm all in her path, there always had to be a sense that Jim in some way retains dominance within the relationship. Being older and being male, he can level with Paul in a way that Debbie cannot and one is allowed to feel that to some extent at least Debbie only gets away with what Jim permits her to, for the sake of a quiet existence.
At the same time of course Jim has the added responsibility of keeping his brother Colin in his box, as the latter's more or less similar size and stature enable him to assert a degree of sibling rivalry which defies the age difference between them. Add to that his oft-expressed exasperation with Steve and emotionally Jim is fighting on every front, whilst being the cog at the epicentre of the mechanism which turns the gang sans Paul.
AN ESSENTIAL LINK
Beyond the genuine affection that Paul has for his closest friend, Jim provides an essential link back to the younger members of the gang without which Paul might well have felt estranged. Generally fourteen and fifteen-year-olds aspire to be seen stepping out with the bigger kids, but Paul is able to move in the preferred company of the younger ones because his sidesman, with the slightly younger girlfriend and the still younger sibling, is from his own stable.
Jim Gray is an important, essential component of the complex intersection of personalities which is the Aitston eight. I don't think the story would have retained any credibility without him - indeed I fear Paul would have been left without much kudos and looking a little, well, strange, and set adrift. At the very least, for Jim the right to wear the lumber jacket is one that has been thoroughly earned.
Jim is just a little bit younger, and just a little bit smaller, than Paul, and at their age this may indeed count for something. But these slender margins of seniority should not be permitted to obscure the seminal role played by Jim in making this story work. He is at the centre of it all - his father runs the club, his girlfriend is Paul's closest competitor, his brother has an integral role to play and, perhaps most importantly, his sense of perspective more than once keeps Paul treading the straightest path.
CREATING THE CORRECT DYNAMIC
Creating the correct dynamic between Jim and Debbie was one of my most difficult challenges during the writing of this book. Whilst Debbie's oozing charisma and cool bravado threatens to overwhelm all in her path, there always had to be a sense that Jim in some way retains dominance within the relationship. Being older and being male, he can level with Paul in a way that Debbie cannot and one is allowed to feel that to some extent at least Debbie only gets away with what Jim permits her to, for the sake of a quiet existence.
At the same time of course Jim has the added responsibility of keeping his brother Colin in his box, as the latter's more or less similar size and stature enable him to assert a degree of sibling rivalry which defies the age difference between them. Add to that his oft-expressed exasperation with Steve and emotionally Jim is fighting on every front, whilst being the cog at the epicentre of the mechanism which turns the gang sans Paul.
AN ESSENTIAL LINK
Beyond the genuine affection that Paul has for his closest friend, Jim provides an essential link back to the younger members of the gang without which Paul might well have felt estranged. Generally fourteen and fifteen-year-olds aspire to be seen stepping out with the bigger kids, but Paul is able to move in the preferred company of the younger ones because his sidesman, with the slightly younger girlfriend and the still younger sibling, is from his own stable.
Jim Gray is an important, essential component of the complex intersection of personalities which is the Aitston eight. I don't think the story would have retained any credibility without him - indeed I fear Paul would have been left without much kudos and looking a little, well, strange, and set adrift. At the very least, for Jim the right to wear the lumber jacket is one that has been thoroughly earned.
Wednesday, 9 May 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Beverley Turner
If Steve Turner is oafish, so his younger sister Beverley is sardonic. She may only be eleven, or twelve as the story progresses, but her innocence is only compounded by her unique and lovable wit. Loyal to Paul, proud of the gang, she is there till the last when most of the others (even Paul) have wandered at least on occasion. Only twice do we see her entirely serious - once with the self-induced, but thankfully temporary, loss of her relationship with Colin Gray, the other as the curtain descends, in Chapter 61.
As far as the aforesaid "relationship" with Colin goes, Paul himself finds he reflects on quite what that means when both parties to it are eleven. But that brings us inevitably to consider what any relationship entails. Or as Bowie might have put it - we're just older children after all.
WITH A WINK AND A SMIRK
Just how central is Beverley to the plot? In my view, very much so. The point of the gang for Paul is that it represents his last shot at childhood, and to hang on to that he needs the gang to stretch backwards, not forwards, just as far as crediblity, and credulity, will allow. As a settled couple who are by no means immature for their ages, she and Colin provide that much needed link back to earlier years without being entirely detached from the where the older ones are with their lives. They are the smallest of the bigger kids that feasibility will allow, as it were.
Beverley is too young to be scary like Debbie, or sensual like Tina, and yet she carves her own niche quite effortlessly with a wink and a smirk.
As far as the aforesaid "relationship" with Colin goes, Paul himself finds he reflects on quite what that means when both parties to it are eleven. But that brings us inevitably to consider what any relationship entails. Or as Bowie might have put it - we're just older children after all.
WITH A WINK AND A SMIRK
Just how central is Beverley to the plot? In my view, very much so. The point of the gang for Paul is that it represents his last shot at childhood, and to hang on to that he needs the gang to stretch backwards, not forwards, just as far as crediblity, and credulity, will allow. As a settled couple who are by no means immature for their ages, she and Colin provide that much needed link back to earlier years without being entirely detached from the where the older ones are with their lives. They are the smallest of the bigger kids that feasibility will allow, as it were.
Beverley is too young to be scary like Debbie, or sensual like Tina, and yet she carves her own niche quite effortlessly with a wink and a smirk.
Wednesday, 21 March 2018
Time to Reflect
Fate has a funny way of intervening just when you’d thought you would never find the time to get that second book under way.
One of my most stubborn enthusiasms has long been working out at the gym. Not that I was ever some Herculean, muscle-bound type but rather, at the age of 56, I simply refuse to grow old any faster than is absolutely necessary. I push a fair weight for an old fellow if I must say so myself and nowhere is this more true when I’m doing legs, which have always been my particular strong point.
I say always, because that rapidly changed the Wednesday before last when my right foot inexplicably slipped off the plate just as I was in the middle of my third set of calf extensions, the resultant sudden trauma to my left leg leaving me with a ruptured Achilles tendon and the prospect of spending the next five weeks in a hospital cast boot which, most irritatingly of all, I must wear even in bed.
SECOND BOOK
Many things that I had intended to do must now fall by the wayside. My expedition to Snowdon, planned for two weeks’ time, is still to go ahead but if I even go near the mountain it will be with a view to catching the passenger train up to the top, and then back again to the bottom. And whilst the need to earn a living dictates that I still find myself struggling up to London on my crutches two to three times each week, most of the other things I’d planned to do which cannot be done from a horizontal position have been shelved.
So it’s on with my second book, which I’d hoped would be on its way to the publisher by now but which is alas still in the very formative stages.
I can’t give much away, but there won’t be much to compare with The Best Year Of Our Lives. It’s of an entirely different format and genre, and much less exciting but is one which nevertheless has to be written before I can hope to progress with my new-found vocation. More on this anon.
One of my most stubborn enthusiasms has long been working out at the gym. Not that I was ever some Herculean, muscle-bound type but rather, at the age of 56, I simply refuse to grow old any faster than is absolutely necessary. I push a fair weight for an old fellow if I must say so myself and nowhere is this more true when I’m doing legs, which have always been my particular strong point.
I say always, because that rapidly changed the Wednesday before last when my right foot inexplicably slipped off the plate just as I was in the middle of my third set of calf extensions, the resultant sudden trauma to my left leg leaving me with a ruptured Achilles tendon and the prospect of spending the next five weeks in a hospital cast boot which, most irritatingly of all, I must wear even in bed.
SECOND BOOK
Many things that I had intended to do must now fall by the wayside. My expedition to Snowdon, planned for two weeks’ time, is still to go ahead but if I even go near the mountain it will be with a view to catching the passenger train up to the top, and then back again to the bottom. And whilst the need to earn a living dictates that I still find myself struggling up to London on my crutches two to three times each week, most of the other things I’d planned to do which cannot be done from a horizontal position have been shelved.
So it’s on with my second book, which I’d hoped would be on its way to the publisher by now but which is alas still in the very formative stages.
I can’t give much away, but there won’t be much to compare with The Best Year Of Our Lives. It’s of an entirely different format and genre, and much less exciting but is one which nevertheless has to be written before I can hope to progress with my new-found vocation. More on this anon.
Monday, 19 March 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Alison Summerfield
Alison has been described as "sweet", and she is, but she is not by any stretch of the imagination a shrinking violet. Yet her friendship with Debbie Stone, whose boldness is striking, coupled with the fact that she is one of the youngest members of the gang, a year Debbie's junior, inevitably creates a suggestion of such a contrast.
I decided not to "partner" Alison with any of her male counterparts, because there was no partnership to be had. Colin is with Beverley, Paul is by some distance too old, Jim is also too old and in any event goes out with Debbie, and Steve just isn't serious enough to have made for a convincing match with her. Alison is pretty, endearing and smart - she will find love, just not in this particular tale.
THE NEBULOUS BRIDGE
As the story develops and Alison and Debbie to a degree find themselves on opposite sides of the nebulous bridge between childhood and adolescence, it was inevitable that they would drift apart, not necessarily in terms of their friendship but in their interests and associations. That is why as Tina wanders inexorably into Debbie's orbit, so Alison identifies more closely with Beverley before introducing an entirely new acquaintance, Jackie, late into the story.
Alison and Jackie would have been an interesting pairing for any sequel, or indeed had the best year of their lives gone on to become two. Alas it wasn't to be, but more than one reader has pointed out to me how Alison grew on them, considerably, at the second reading. I don't wish to sound boastful, but that was precisely the intention.
I decided not to "partner" Alison with any of her male counterparts, because there was no partnership to be had. Colin is with Beverley, Paul is by some distance too old, Jim is also too old and in any event goes out with Debbie, and Steve just isn't serious enough to have made for a convincing match with her. Alison is pretty, endearing and smart - she will find love, just not in this particular tale.
THE NEBULOUS BRIDGE
As the story develops and Alison and Debbie to a degree find themselves on opposite sides of the nebulous bridge between childhood and adolescence, it was inevitable that they would drift apart, not necessarily in terms of their friendship but in their interests and associations. That is why as Tina wanders inexorably into Debbie's orbit, so Alison identifies more closely with Beverley before introducing an entirely new acquaintance, Jackie, late into the story.
Alison and Jackie would have been an interesting pairing for any sequel, or indeed had the best year of their lives gone on to become two. Alas it wasn't to be, but more than one reader has pointed out to me how Alison grew on them, considerably, at the second reading. I don't wish to sound boastful, but that was precisely the intention.
Saturday, 10 February 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Debbie Stone
Debbie is Paul's only realistic challenger for the leadership of the gang. Although younger than himself, Jim and Tina the power of her personality and the extent of her self-belief lead her inevitably to test Paul's resolve, and to probe his weaknesses. And despite the fact that he wins on those occasions when they do go head to head, he never quite manages to put her back in her box.
I worked hard on developing the contrast between Debbie and her best friend Alison, because they are not entirely opposites. Alison is not altogether retiring, simply less outward than her slightly older friend. The challenge throughout The Best Year Of Our Lives was to make them the same, but to such a varying degree that they were at the same time different.
ANOTHER LEADER
Debbie is Jim's girlfriend, and though unlike Paul and Tina they are unambiguously joined I felt the need to overshadow them as the senior "item" within the group by the implied, almost-relationship of their respective elders. And yet when Debbie and Tina get together, it is the former who if anyone is in charge.
In a story which centres around the ego of one individual it is not easy to create and develop another leader, someone who is subordinate to the lead character yet at the same time so obviously free-spirited and instinctively dominant. Only by her being two years his junior could I manage to perfect the hierarchical balance.
I think that casting Debbie was my most challenging assignment, aside of course from Paul himself. The fact that my daughter captured her to a tee with her cover artwork before she had even read the book tells me, I think, that I managed to pitch her as I had intended.
I worked hard on developing the contrast between Debbie and her best friend Alison, because they are not entirely opposites. Alison is not altogether retiring, simply less outward than her slightly older friend. The challenge throughout The Best Year Of Our Lives was to make them the same, but to such a varying degree that they were at the same time different.
ANOTHER LEADER
Debbie is Jim's girlfriend, and though unlike Paul and Tina they are unambiguously joined I felt the need to overshadow them as the senior "item" within the group by the implied, almost-relationship of their respective elders. And yet when Debbie and Tina get together, it is the former who if anyone is in charge.
In a story which centres around the ego of one individual it is not easy to create and develop another leader, someone who is subordinate to the lead character yet at the same time so obviously free-spirited and instinctively dominant. Only by her being two years his junior could I manage to perfect the hierarchical balance.
I think that casting Debbie was my most challenging assignment, aside of course from Paul himself. The fact that my daughter captured her to a tee with her cover artwork before she had even read the book tells me, I think, that I managed to pitch her as I had intended.
Sunday, 21 January 2018
The Best Year Of Our Lives: The Characters - Colin Gray
Colin is the younger of two brothers within the gang. In actual fact he has another brother, Jason, who is three years his junior and who makes a brief appearance early into the story, but he is too young to have been a part of the experience and thus doesn't really feature.
But Colin is not just one of the founder members of the gang. He is quite central to the story if one looks at the gang as a fishing net, with its interwoven cords, rather than as a spider's web with all threads leading to and from the epicentre. In The Best Year Of Our Lives Colin is a boyfriend to Beverley and a brother to Jim, with whom he is fiercely competitive for Paul's respect, and indeed for the respect of others.
He is one of the four members of the eight who begin the story as first-years at their respective primary schools, but he is tall and strong and looks older than his eleven years. He lacks Jim's maturity but they are close enough to be competitive.
Loyalty is Colin's watchword - to Paul, to the eight, and in a sometimes less than obvious way to his big brother also. Most of all he is loyal to Beverley, which at their tender ages is no small achievement. Paul at one point in the story finds himself reflecting upon what might make two kids of their tender vintage an item as opposed to just friends, but whatever it is Colin and Beverley have it and retain it (more or less) throughout.
But Colin is not just one of the founder members of the gang. He is quite central to the story if one looks at the gang as a fishing net, with its interwoven cords, rather than as a spider's web with all threads leading to and from the epicentre. In The Best Year Of Our Lives Colin is a boyfriend to Beverley and a brother to Jim, with whom he is fiercely competitive for Paul's respect, and indeed for the respect of others.
He is one of the four members of the eight who begin the story as first-years at their respective primary schools, but he is tall and strong and looks older than his eleven years. He lacks Jim's maturity but they are close enough to be competitive.
Loyalty is Colin's watchword - to Paul, to the eight, and in a sometimes less than obvious way to his big brother also. Most of all he is loyal to Beverley, which at their tender ages is no small achievement. Paul at one point in the story finds himself reflecting upon what might make two kids of their tender vintage an item as opposed to just friends, but whatever it is Colin and Beverley have it and retain it (more or less) throughout.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


